All Categories
Agentic Fundamentals: LLMs, Agents, and Agentic Systems
Technical foundation: Understanding the building blocks of autonomous AI systems from LLMs to fully agentic fraud operations
Part 1: Large Language Models (LLMs)
What Is an LLM?
A Large Language Model is an AI system trained to predict the next word in a sequence of text. LLMs are trained on massive datasets (trillions of words) to learn patterns in human language.
Core Function:
- Input: Text sequence
- Output: Prediction of what comes next
- Method: Statistical probability based on training data
How LLMs Work
Training Process:
- Data Ingestion: Fed billions of documents (web pages, books, articles)
- Pattern Learning: Learns relationships between words, concepts, and contexts
- Probability Modeling: Develops statistical understanding of language patterns
- Fine-tuning: Optimized for specific tasks and safety
Inference Process:
- Input Processing: Receives text prompt
- Context Analysis: Analyzes meaning and context
- Prediction: Generates most probable next words
- Output Generation: Produces human-like text response
LLM Capabilities
Text Generation:
- Write in any style (formal, casual, technical)
- Translate between languages
- Summarize documents
- Generate code, emails, reports
Analysis:
- Extract information from documents
- Answer questions about content
- Identify patterns and relationships
- Classify and categorize text
Reasoning:
- Follow logical steps
- Break down complex problems
- Make connections between concepts
- Apply learned knowledge to new situations
LLM Limitations
No Real-World Actions:
- Cannot access external systems
- Cannot execute code or commands
- Cannot browse the internet
- Cannot remember between conversations
No Learning:
- Cannot update knowledge from interactions
- Cannot adapt to new information
- Cannot improve from experience
- Fixed knowledge cutoff date
Context Limitations:
- Limited memory window (conversation length)
- No persistent memory across sessions
- Cannot maintain long-term state
- Loses context when limit exceeded
Fraud-Relevant LLM Capabilities
Content Creation:
- Generate convincing phishing emails
- Create realistic social media profiles
- Write persuasive social engineering scripts
- Produce institutional communications
Analysis:
- Process fraud investigation reports
- Identify patterns in transaction data
- Analyze customer communication styles
- Extract key information from documents
Part 2: AI Agents
What Is an AI Agent?
An AI Agent is an LLM enhanced with additional capabilities that allow it to:
- Remember previous interactions
- Use tools to access external systems
- Plan multi-step tasks
- Execute actions in sequence
Agent = LLM + Memory + Tools + Planning + Execution
Agent Architecture
┌─────────────────┐
│ LLM Core │ ← Language understanding and generation
└─────────────────┘
│
┌─────────────────┐
│ Memory │ ← Stores conversation history and context
└─────────────────┘
│
┌─────────────────┐
│ Tool Access │ ← Interfaces with external systems
└─────────────────┘
│
┌─────────────────┐
│ Planning │ ← Breaks down complex tasks
└─────────────────┘
│
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execution │ ← Carries out planned actions
└─────────────────┘
Memory Systems
Short-term Memory:
- Current conversation context
- Active task progress
- Immediate goals and objectives
Long-term Memory:
- Historical interactions
- Learned user preferences
- Accumulated knowledge and experience
Working Memory:
- Temporary storage for multi-step tasks
- Intermediate results and calculations
- Planning states and progress tracking
Tool Integration
Database Access:
- Query customer records
- Search transaction histories
- Access fraud databases
- Retrieve account information
Communication Tools:
- Send emails and SMS messages
- Make phone calls
- Post to social media
- Send system notifications
Analysis Tools:
- Run fraud detection algorithms
- Generate reports and summaries
- Perform statistical analysis
- Create visualizations
System Integration:
- Update case management systems
- Trigger security protocols
- Modify account settings
- Execute financial transactions
Planning Capabilities
Task Decomposition:
- Break complex goals into smaller steps
- Identify required resources and tools
- Determine optimal execution sequence
- Plan for contingencies and error handling
Goal Management:
- Maintain focus on primary objectives
- Balance competing priorities
- Adapt plans based on changing conditions
- Track progress toward completion
Resource Management:
- Allocate available tools and systems
- Optimize for efficiency and effectiveness
- Handle resource constraints
- Coordinate multiple parallel tasks
Execution Framework
Action Sequencing:
- Execute planned steps in order
- Handle dependencies between actions
- Manage timing and coordination
- Ensure proper error handling
Feedback Processing:
- Monitor results of each action
- Adjust subsequent steps based on outcomes
- Learn from successes and failures
- Update plans based on new information
Error Recovery:
- Detect when actions fail
- Implement backup strategies
- Escalate to human oversight when needed
- Maintain system integrity
Part 3: Agentic Systems
What Does "Agentic" Mean?
Agency refers to the capacity to act independently and make decisions to achieve goals. An agentic system demonstrates:
- Autonomy - Acts without constant human direction
- Intentionality - Has goals and works toward them
- Adaptability - Modifies behavior based on results
- Persistence - Continues working over extended periods
The Agentic Spectrum
Level 1 - Reactive: Responds to specific prompts and requests Level 2 - Proactive: Initiates actions to achieve assigned goals Level 3 - Adaptive: Modifies strategies based on environmental feedback Level 4 - Learning: Improves capabilities through experience Level 5 - Creative: Develops novel approaches to achieve objectives
Key Agentic Properties
Goal-Directed Behavior:
- Maintains focus on specific objectives
- Makes decisions that advance toward goals
- Balances short-term actions with long-term objectives
- Prioritizes tasks based on goal importance
Environmental Awareness:
- Monitors changing conditions
- Responds to new information
- Adapts to unexpected situations
- Learns from environmental feedback
Strategic Thinking:
- Plans multiple steps ahead
- Considers alternative approaches
- Anticipates potential obstacles
- Optimizes for success probability
Self-Monitoring:
- Tracks own performance
- Identifies areas for improvement
- Adjusts strategies based on results
- Recognizes when to seek help
Agentic vs. Traditional Systems
Traditional Automation:
IF condition THEN action
- Fixed rules and responses
- No adaptation or learning
- Limited to programmed scenarios
- Requires human updates
Agentic Systems:
GOAL: Achieve objective
METHOD: Adapt approach based on results
- Dynamic strategy development
- Continuous learning and adaptation
- Handles novel situations
- Self-improving capabilities
Multi-Agent Coordination
Agent Communication:
- Share information and updates
- Coordinate parallel activities
- Negotiate resource allocation
- Synchronize timing and actions
Collective Intelligence:
- Combine specialized capabilities
- Distribute complex tasks
- Learn from shared experiences
- Achieve goals beyond individual capacity
Emergent Behaviors:
- Systems exhibit capabilities not programmed explicitly
- Agents develop novel coordination strategies
- Collective problem-solving approaches emerge
- Complex behaviors arise from simple rules
Part 4: Technical Implementation Frameworks
Understanding how these systems actually work in practice
Agent Framework Architecture (LangChain Pattern)
Router Agent (Decision Engine):
Loading diagram...
Core Components:
- Task Classification: Analyzes incoming requests to determine approach
- Agent Selection: Chooses optimal specialist agent for each task
- Resource Management: Allocates computational resources efficiently
- Quality Control: Monitors output quality and consistency
Tool Integration Patterns
Agent Tool-Calling Workflow:
# Simplified example of agent tool access class FraudAgent: def __init__(self): self.tools = { "web_scraper": WebScrapingTool(), "voice_synthesizer": VoiceTool(), "email_composer": EmailTool(), "credential_validator": ValidationTool() } def execute_attack(self, target_profile): # Router decides which tools to use intel = self.tools["web_scraper"].gather_intel(target_profile) voice_script = self.tools["voice_synthesizer"].create_script(intel) email = self.tools["email_composer"].craft_phishing_email(intel) return self.coordinate_attack(voice_script, email)
Tool Categories:
- Information Gathering: Social media scrapers, data breach analyzers, public record searchers
- Communication: Voice synthesis, email composition, SMS messaging, web form automation
- Infrastructure: Domain registration, proxy management, credential validation
- Coordination: Task scheduling, progress monitoring, success tracking
Memory Management Systems
Persistent Knowledge Architecture:
Agent Memory Stack:
├── Working Memory (Current Session)
│ ├── Target conversation state
│ ├── Active tool outputs
│ └── Real-time decision context
├── Episodic Memory (Campaign History)
│ ├── Previous target interactions
│ ├── Successful attack patterns
│ └── Failed attempt analysis
└── Semantic Memory (Knowledge Base)
├── Institution profiles (banks, companies)
├── Social engineering techniques
└── Security bypass methods
Memory Types in Practice:
- Vector Stores: Embedding-based similarity search for target research
- Conversation Buffers: Maintaining context across multi-hour campaigns
- Knowledge Graphs: Mapping relationships between targets, institutions, and attack vectors
- Success Metrics: Tracking what works for continuous improvement
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Multi-Step Attack Planning:
Reasoning Chain Example:
1. GOAL: Compromise target's bank account
2. ANALYSIS: Target is cautious, high-value professional
3. APPROACH: Multi-channel credibility building required
4. PLAN:
├── Step 1: Gather intel from social media (2-3 days)
├── Step 2: Send initial "fraud alert" SMS (creates urgency)
├── Step 3: Follow with spoofed bank call (builds trust)
├── Step 4: Direct to phishing site (captures credentials)
└── Step 5: Execute transfer while maintaining phone contact
5. EXECUTION: Deploy specialized agents for each step
6. MONITORING: Track success metrics and adapt as needed
Reasoning Components:
- Situational Analysis: Understanding target psychology and security awareness
- Strategy Selection: Choosing optimal attack vector combinations
- Timing Optimization: Coordinating actions for maximum effectiveness
- Risk Assessment: Evaluating detection probability and mitigation strategies
Multi-Agent Coordination Frameworks
Hierarchical Coordination Pattern:
Loading diagram...
Communication Protocols:
- Message Bus: Instant updates between all agents (Redis/RabbitMQ pattern)
- Event Triggers: Automated handoffs based on success criteria
- Shared State: Real-time synchronized knowledge across all agents
- Failover Logic: Backup agents activate when primary agents fail
Real-World Framework Examples
LangChain-Style Social Engineering Bot:
SocialEngineeringChain:
├── RouterAgent(decides_approach)
├── ResearchAgent(gathers_target_intel)
├── PersonalizationAgent(crafts_messages)
├── ChannelAgents(sms, voice, email, web)
├── CredibilityAgent(maintains_institutional_facade)
└── ExecutionAgent(processes_captured_credentials)
AutoGPT-Style Persistent Campaign:
CampaignManager:
├── Goal: "Compromise target banking credentials"
├── Planning: Multi-step strategy development
├── Execution: Autonomous task completion
├── Memory: Persistent learning from attempts
└── Adaptation: Strategy refinement based on results
Detection Implications of Technical Patterns
Framework Signatures:
- Router Patterns: Unnaturally efficient task delegation
- Tool Chains: Perfect integration between disparate systems
- Memory Persistence: Superhuman recall across long time periods
- Coordination Speed: Impossible human response times
Technical Red Flags:
Agentic Attack Indicators:
├── Perfect API Integration (no human errors)
├── Millisecond Cross-Channel Coordination
├── Unlimited Working Memory (perfect recall)
├── Consistent Execution Quality (no fatigue)
└── Simultaneous Multi-Target Operations
Framework Evolution Trends
Current Capabilities (2024-2025):
- LangChain/LlamaIndex frameworks enable complex agent workflows
- GPT-4/Claude-level reasoning with tool integration
- Vector databases enable persistent memory at scale
- Multi-agent frameworks coordinate dozens of specialized agents
Emerging Capabilities (2025-2026):
- Self-improving agent architectures
- Cross-platform agent migration
- Autonomous infrastructure management
- Advanced adversarial adaptation
Part 5: Implications for Fraud
Traditional Fraud Assumptions
Human Limitations:
- Limited working memory and attention
- Fatigue and consistency issues
- Geographic and time constraints
- Communication delays and errors
Linear Progression:
- Attacks follow predictable patterns
- Step-by-step progression
- Limited coordination between activities
- Clear cause-and-effect relationships
Agentic Fraud Realities
Superhuman Capabilities:
- Perfect memory and consistency
- 24/7 operation without fatigue
- Simultaneous coordination across hundreds of parallel campaigns
- Instant communication and updates
Non-Linear Attacks:
- Simultaneous multi-channel coordination
- Adaptive strategies in real-time
- Complex interdependent activities
- Emergent attack patterns
What Changes
Scale:
- From individual attacks to coordinated campaigns
- From single targets to simultaneous institutional-scale campaigns
- From limited to unlimited parallel activities
- From hours to milliseconds response time
Sophistication:
- From simple scripts to adaptive strategies
- From generic to perfectly personalized
- From detectable patterns to dynamic variation
- From reactive to proactive approaches
Coordination:
- From independent actors to networked systems
- From sequential to parallel execution
- From communication delays to instant updates
- From human errors to perfect consistency
Detection Challenges
Pattern Recognition:
- Traditional patterns no longer apply
- Perfect execution leaves fewer indicators
- Adaptive behavior defeats static rules
- Coordinated activities span multiple systems
Scale Mismatches:
- Detection systems designed for human-scale threats
- Alert systems overwhelmed by parallel activities
- Analysis tools assume human limitations
- Response times inadequate for agentic speeds
Behavioral Analysis:
- Human behavioral models become irrelevant
- Consistency becomes suspicious rather than normal
- Traditional fraud indicators fail
- New metrics needed for agentic detection
Key Technical Concepts
LLM Foundation
- Transformer Architecture: Neural network design enabling language understanding
- Training Scale: Billions to trillions of parameters for sophisticated reasoning
- Context Windows: Memory limitations affecting conversation length
- Prompt Engineering: Techniques for effective LLM interaction
Agent Enhancement
- Memory Management: Systems for persistent information storage
- Tool Integration: APIs and interfaces for external system access
- Planning Algorithms: Methods for multi-step task decomposition
- Execution Engines: Frameworks for reliable action performance
Agentic Properties
- Goal Optimization: Algorithms for objective-directed behavior
- Adaptation Mechanisms: Learning systems for strategy improvement
- Coordination Protocols: Communication methods for multi-agent systems
- Emergence Patterns: Behaviors arising from complex system interactions
Practical Applications
Legitimate Uses
Customer Service:
- 24/7 support with perfect knowledge retention
- Personalized interactions at scale
- Multi-language support with cultural awareness
- Complex problem resolution with escalation protocols
Fraud Detection:
- Continuous monitoring of all transactions
- Adaptive pattern recognition
- Real-time risk assessment
- Coordinated response across systems
Malicious Applications
Social Engineering:
- Perfect personalization based on extensive research
- Multi-channel coordination for credibility
- Adaptive conversation strategies
- Persistent persuasion campaigns
Financial Fraud:
- Automated account takeover attempts
- Coordinated transaction manipulation
- Real-time adaptation to security measures
- Large-scale parallel operations
Summary
Understanding the Progression
- LLMs: Advanced text generation and analysis
- Agents: LLMs enhanced with memory, tools, and planning
- Agentic Systems: Autonomous operation toward goals with adaptation
Key Differentiators
- LLMs: Reactive text processing
- Agents: Active task execution
- Agentic: Independent goal pursuit
Fraud Professional Implications
Traditional methods assume human attackers with human limitations. Agentic systems operate without these constraints, requiring fundamentally different defensive approaches.
Next: Examining specific agentic fraud attack patterns and defensive strategies.
Fast Facts
- Response Speed: Modern AI systems achieve sub-600ms response times, approaching human conversation speed (LLM Latency Research)
- Agent Capabilities: Advanced multi-agent frameworks can coordinate 100+ tools and capabilities simultaneously (Multi-Agent Systems Overview)
- Processing Speed: AI systems demonstrate latency-sensitive decision making with significant speed advantages over human reaction times (AI Speed Research)
- Parallel Operations: Modern systems support 10,000+ parallel operations through advanced parallelization techniques (Parallel Computing Guide)
- Hardware Acceleration: Cutting-edge photonic AI processors achieve near-electronic precision while processing complex models like ResNet and BERT (Photonic AI Acceleration)
Sources: Recent AI research papers, technical documentation, and peer-reviewed studies from 2024-2025
Test Your Knowledge
Ready to test what you've learned? Take the quiz to reinforce your understanding.